The legislation currently being debated in the Oireachtas will determine our ability to access abortion care for years to come, so it is essential that we work together to get it right. ARC believes that abortion – like any other medical procedure – is a private matter between a pregnant person, their medical provider, and whomever they choose to tell. We believe that abortion should be free, safe, and legal. Pregnant people deserve compassionate healthcare and support, no matter their reason for having an abortion.

Enforced waiting periods

The Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Bill 2018 includes a mandatory waiting time of three days. Not only are mandatory waiting periods medically unnecessary, they are also a violation of a pregnant person’s privacy. The required three-day wait separates out people who need abortions from other patients and makes it harder for people to keep their abortion private. Mandatory waiting periods totally contradict the idea of the pregnant person as the decision-maker and stand in opposition to ideals of patient-centred care.

A recent article from The Times UK uncovered that certain anti-choice groups regard the mandatory waiting period as an opportunity to target and intimidate people seeking an abortion. For example, a UK-based group called Family and Life has admitted to creating an “action programme” that manipulates the proposed three-day forced delay with anti-abortion propaganda, including a national advertising campaign, spending €7,000 on targeted social media advertising, and spending €10,000 to provide every GP in Ireland with a booklet written by anti-abortion organisations. When asked to comment on which crisis pregnancy counselling agencies they would be including in this campaign, the group refused to engage with The Times journalists.

According to the World Health Organisation, there is “growing international consensus that all patients have a fundamental right to privacy, to the confidentiality of their medical information, to consent to or to refuse treatment, and to be informed about relevant risk to them of medical procedures.” The proposed actions of the anti-choice group mentioned above would completely violate patient privacy, confidentiality, and autonomy. In the same article, Senator Ivana Bacik, long time campaigner for reproductive rights, stated:  

“There has been a history of obstructionism and intimidation of women in crisis pregnancies by anti-abortion groups. My clear view is that this should be a real worry for us as legislators and something to bear in mind as we move forward to legislate for a new system to allow women to access reproductive rights.”

 

Rogue agencies

Rogue crisis pregnancy agencies which deliberately mislead women facing crisis pregnancies about their reproductive options, including abortion, invade pregnant people’s privacy in order to manipulate their decisions about pregnancy. In Ireland, these groups can escape scrutiny because they do not receive public funding. In fact, the Times UK article made the link between the UK anti-choice group Family & Life and Gianna Care, an unregulated anti-abortion agency operating in Ireland which has made the misleading and false claim that “all women who have an abortion regret it”. A similar agency in Ireland named the Women’s Resource Centre was exposed in 2016 by undercover reporters, having falsely claimed to that abortion increases the likelihood of breast cancer, miscarriage, sterility and child abuse.

While Minister for Health Simon Harris has pledged to crack down on the “misleading nonsense” pedalled by rogue agencies, the Health Service Executive has stated in the past that they are in a constant battle to counter the false information circulated by such organisations. This ongoing challenge highlights the urgent need for clear and robust legislation to regulate such agencies alongside the government’s abortion legislation.

Invasive and unnecessary procedures

In certain states in the US, anti-choice groups have undermined principles of informed consent by getting legislation passed that forces pregnant people to jump over unecessary hurdles to access abortion.  These include mandatory “counselling” which typically contains false, stigmatising and dangerous information intended to dissuade them from having an abortion, or medically unnecessary procedures, such as ultrasounds, prior to their abortion. Last week, the Oireachtas Select Health Committee rejected amendments that would have added such provisions to the abortion legislation; however, they could come up again for debate in the Seanad.

Rules about reporting abortion-related data have also been used as a tool by anti-choice campaigners to regulate pregnant people’s choices. For example, forcing healthcare providers to record the reasons for a person’s decision to terminate a pregnancy is both medically unnecessary and a violation of the pregnant person’s privacy.

Safe access zones

Ensuring access to safe abortion involves taking a stand against anti-choice harassment and intimidation outside of medical facilities. In a UK-based survey, people who’d been to clinics said that presence of anti-choice protesters felt like a clear invasion of their privacy and was an attempt to stigmatise their healthcare decisions. Medical practitioners’ privacy and personal safety are also threatened by the presence of anti-choice harassers, as research with clinic workers in Canada found. With abortion services due to roll out in a matter of weeks, it is time for the Government to explain how it intends to carry out its promise to secure safe access zones.

What can be done to safeguard privacy in Ireland?

Ultimately, affirming pregnant people’s rights includes safeguarding their privacy. In terms of the legislation, this means ensuring the following steps are taken:

• Include only provisions that are medically necessary.
  Respecting patients and their privacy involves basing practice on medical evidence. This entails getting rid of the stigmatising and impractical mandatory waiting period. Equally, no one should be forced to answer medically irrelevant questions, such as the reason they want an abortion.

 

• Outlaw rogue agencies.
  The Department of Health have repeatedly expressed their willingness to regulate and ultimately outlaw rogue agencies. The recent statements by anti-choice agencies, as well as the use of graphic imagery outside maternity hospitals during the Referendum campaign, make clear that the appropriate protections and regulations must be implemented now
• Set up safe-access zones.
  Safe access to healthcare facilities is essential in order to protect the safety and privacy of pregnant people and their healthcare providers.

If you feel strongly that patient privacy should be reflected in this legislation, contact your TDs or write a letter to the editor.